
Google Gemini: Both the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Norway import copper, but they do so for distinct reasons given their differing industrial footprints and role in European trade logistics.
1. Kingdom of the Netherlands
Role & Import Profile
- Import Type: The Netherlands imports refined copper cathodes, semi-manufactured copper articles, wire, and scrap rather than raw unrefined ores.
- Primary Drivers: It functions as Europe’s central trading hub (the Rotterdam Effect). Unwrought copper and semi-finished copper flow through the Port of Rotterdam to feed downstream European manufacturing (notably in Germany and Belgium), as well as domestic high-tech manufacturing, electrical engineering, cabling, and construction.
- Import Value: Imports of refined copper cathodes hover around $750 million to $800+ million annually.
Key Supplier Regions & Countries
- European Union / Intra-European Trade:
- Germany & Belgium: Major European metallurgical and recycling plants supply finished wire, rods, and cathodes to Dutch fabricators.
- Poland & Sweden: Key regional producers of refined cathodes.
- Sub-Saharan Africa & South America (Raw & Refined Cathodes):
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) & Republic of the Congo: Primary sources of raw/refined unwrought copper shipped via global commodity trading houses.
- Chile & Brazil: Major South American mining hubs supplying copper to EU entry points.
- North America & Central Asia: Canada (copper concentrates/ores) and Uzbekistan. The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC)
Major Mining, Smelting & Trading Companies Supplying the Market
- Aurubis AG (Germany): Europe’s largest copper smelter and recycler, supplying refined copper products across Northern Europe.
- KGHM Polska Miedź (Poland): One of Europe’s largest primary copper miners and refiners.
- Boliden AB (Sweden): Operates smelters (e.g., Rönnskär) and mines supplying Nordic and Dutch markets.
- Glencore & Trafigura (Switzerland/Global): The primary commodity trading houses routing African (DRC) and South American copper through Dutch ports.
2. Kingdom of Norway
Role & Import Profile
- Import Type: Norway’s industrial base relies heavily on domestic primary aluminum production (hydro-powered smelting), but it must import copper—primarily as refined copper cathodes, copper wire/cabling, powders, and alloyed products. The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC)
- Primary Drivers: Norway’s demand is heavily tied to its marine, offshore oil & gas, renewable energy (offshore wind & subsea grid connections), and electrification infrastructure, all of which require vast amounts of heavy-duty insulated copper wiring and cabling.

This is a rendered image of copper bars.
Key Supplier Regions & Countries
- Nordic & European Neighbors (Overwhelming Majority):
- Sweden & Finland: Norway relies heavily on neighboring Nordic supply chains for refined copper cathode and processed wire rod.
- Germany & United Kingdom: High-grade engineering copper, specialized copper powders, and heavy subsea power cables.
- Global Primary Producers:
- Chile and Peru supply cathode material via European distribution networks.
Major Companies Supplying the Norwegian Market
- Boliden AB (Sweden): Serves as the primary regional copper supplier for Scandinavia.
- Outokumpu / Luvata (Finland): Supplies specialized copper alloys and manufacturing feedstocks.
- Nexans & NKT: Key subsea and power cable manufacturers operating in the Nordics that handle copper rod conversion for Norwegian offshore projects.
- Aurubis AG (Germany): Major exporter of refined copper products into the Nordic market.
Key Comparison
| Feature | Kingdom of the Netherlands | Kingdom of Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Use | Transit trade, warehousing, high-tech manufacturing, and European re-exporting. | Energy sector (offshore wind/grid), subsea cabling, maritime engineering. |
| Import Form | Refined cathodes, unwrought alloys, scrap, finished articles. | Electrical wiring, cable rod, specialized copper powders, and cathodes. |
| Top Regional Sources | Germany, Belgium, DRC, Chile, Poland, Congo. | Sweden, Germany, UK, Finland. |

Reint Jelger: But you would agree to that the missiles this Norwegian company also makes, make more money in terms of revenue to the company overall
Google Gemini: Yes, absolutely. You are entirely correct.
When looking at the revenue breakdown of Kongsberg Gruppen, their missile systems and defense operations (housed under Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace) generate substantially more revenue than their subsea technology and unmanned vehicles.
A closer look at how the financial weight breaks down highlights why:
1. The Heavyweight: Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (KDA)
- Revenue Share: KDA regularly accounts for roughly 50% of the entire group’s total revenue, and in recent years, defense segment revenues have surged past NOK 20 to 25 billion on their own as global defense spending has spiked.
- The Flagship Products: While they make remote weapon stations and command systems, their most famous and commercially lucrative big-ticket items are missile systems:
- NASAMS (Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System): Developed in partnership with Raytheon, it is a primary air-defense shield used by numerous nations, including guarding the airspace around Washington D.C.
- NSM (Naval Strike Missile) & JSM (Joint Strike Missile): Highly sought-after anti-ship and precision-strike cruise missiles adopted by the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, F-35 operators, and multiple allied European/Asian navies.
2. Comparing the Scale
While HUGIN AUVs and subsea sensors are engineering marvels that command high price tags per unit, they are sold in smaller fleet quantities primarily to specialized survey companies, research institutes, and select navies.
In contrast, multi-million-dollar missile contracts, mass production of NASAMS batteries, and major international defense procurement orders drive the bulk of Kongsberg’s top-line growth and corporate profit expansion.
Reint Jelger: Is it possible to be a stockholder in Kongsberg Gruppen ASA Norway, and believe in world peace at the same time?
Gemini: Yes, it is entirely possible, and it represents a common stance within modern geopolitical ethics, investment, and international relations philosophy. Whether these two positions align depends on how an investor views the role of modern defense technology in maintaining global stability.
Here are the primary ways people reconcile holding stock in a company like Kongsberg Gruppen ASA with a strong belief in world peace:
1. The Principle of Deterrence (“Peace Through Strength”)
A foundational concept in international law and strategy—dating back to the Latin adage Si vis pacem, para bellum («If you want peace, prepare for war»)—is that war is best prevented when peace-loving democracies possess sufficient defense capabilities to deter potential aggressors.
- Defensive Arms: Systems produced by Kongsberg, such as the NASAMS air defense system, are specifically designed to protect civilian populations, cities, and critical infrastructure from incoming missile and drone strikes.
- Supporting Sovereignty: From this perspective, investing in defense manufacturers provides the technological foundation necessary to uphold national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and international order, thereby preventing conquest and major military conflict.
2. Defense as Strategic Stability & Subsea Security
Kongsberg’s portfolio extends beyond weaponry into environmental, navigational, and infrastructure security:
- Infrastructure Protection: As seen with their HUGIN AUVs, Kongsberg’s technology is used to monitor subsea internet cables, energy pipelines, and environmental ecosystems. Protecting vital energy and communications infrastructure prevents hybrid warfare and economic destabilization.
- Compliance & Regulation: Norway operates under some of the world’s strictest military export control frameworks. Kongsberg operates within tight democratic oversight, export regulations, and international treaties, which appeals to investors who distinguish between regulated state defense and unregulated arms trade.
3. Ethical Frameworks & Responsible Investing (ESG)
In recent years, institutional investors and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) frameworks have actively debated the role of defense stocks:
- The Evolving ESG View: Historically, many ethical funds excluded defense stocks entirely. However, global events in recent years have led many European funds and ethicists to reclassify national defense as a necessary component of «Social» stability and democratic governance—arguing that peace and human rights cannot exist without security.
- Deterrence vs. Aggression: Investors often distinguish between companies that supply sovereign defense systems to allied democracies versus those involved in controversial weaponry or sales to oppressive regimes.
Alternative Ethical Perspectives
Conversely, strict pacifist or non-violent philosophical frameworks hold that:
- Any capital directed toward defense manufacturing inherently contributes to the global military-industrial complex.
- True world peace requires demilitarization and diplomatic resolution, rather than relying on armed deterrence.
Summary
Believing in world peace while holding shares in a defense and technology company like Kongsberg often comes down to viewing defensive technology not as a tool for waging war, but as a protective shield that deters conflict and preserves international stability.













