Google Gemini: In Dutch legal and financial practice, yes, it is largely true that a high-net-worth individual with schizophrenia under legal guardianship or financial stewardship (beschermingsbewind or curateledossier) would receive private banking services without executive operational authority, and their wealth would be invested in a conservative or neutral risk profile.

At a net worth of €204,000,000, the structural setup involves distinct legal boundaries, institutional mandates, and asset allocation strategies.
Legal and Operational Dynamics
1. No Executive Power for the Individual Under Dutch Civil Code (Book 1, Title 19/20 Burgerlijk Wetboek), when a subdistrict court judge (kantonrechter) places a person’s assets under beschermingsbewind (financial stewardship) or curatele (guardianship), the individual loses the legal capacity to execute financial transactions independently.
- The Stewardship Realignment: The court-appointed financial steward (bewindvoerder or curator) holds sole executive authority over bank accounts, wealth management mandates, and contractual commitments.
- Bank Onboarding & Account Access: Major private banks such as ABN AMRO MeesPierson or Van Lanschot Kempen check the Central Curatorship and Stewardship Register (Centraal curatele- en bewindregister). The individual receives a designated allowance account (leefgeldrekening) for daily living expenses, while all primary capital accounts require the signature of the steward.

2. Strict judicial oversight on investment strategy The kantonrechter exercises supervisory authority over the steward.
Advocatie
- Dutch subdistrict court guidelines (Aanbevelingen Meerderjarigenbescherming) require capital under stewardship to be preserved safely and productively.
- Speculative positions, highly leveraged strategies, or high-beta equities are generally disallowed by judges.
- As a result, private banks are instructed under a discretionary management mandate (discretionair vermogensbeheer) to operate within Defensive (20–30% equity / 70–80% fixed income) or Low-Neutral (40% equity / 60% fixed income) parameters.
Institutional Investment Structure at Van Lanschot Kempen (€204,000,000)
At €204 million, the portfolio transcends retail private banking and qualifies for Van Lanschot Kempen’s Family Office Solutions / Single Asset Management Desk. Rather than holding a single off-the-shelf fund, the steward and bank structure the balance sheet across multi-asset institutional vehicles, customized bond ladders, and liquidity buffers.
Example Defensive-to-Neutral Allocation Framework
| Asset Category | Target Allocation | Allocation (€) | Specific Holdings & Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Liquidity | 5.0% | €10,200,000 | Money market instruments, direct ECB-linked deposits, short-dated Dutch Treasury Certificates (DTCs). |
| High-Grade Fixed Income | 45.0% | €91,800,000 | AAA/AA European Sovereign Debt (AAA Dutch Staatsobligaties, German Bunds) in customized maturities (1–10 year ladder). |
| Investment Grade Corporate Bonds | 15.0% | €30,600,000 | EUR Corporate Bonds (A/BBB rated European financial & industrial issuers via Kempen Euro Credit Strategy). |
| Global Core Equities | 25.0% | €51,000,000 | High-dividend global equities, low-volatility large-cap funds, Kempen Sustainable Global Equity Fund. |
| Listed Real Estate & Infrastructure | 10.0% | €20,400,000 | Kempen Listed Real Estate Europe, essential global infrastructure holdings providing inflation-linked cash flow. |
| Total | 100.0% | €204,000,000 | Designed for capital preservation, inflation hedging, and steady annual distribution. |
Detailed Breakdown of Bond Holdings & Basket Implementation
1. Fixed Income Architecture (€122,400,000 Total Fixed Income & Cash)
To comply with court supervisory standards, fixed income dominates the portfolio:
- Sovereign Bond Ladder (€91.8M): Direct holdings of Dutch government bonds (Nederlandse Staatsobligaties) and German sovereign debt (Bunds). Capital is partitioned into ten yield buckets maturing sequentially every 12 months over a 10-year period. Reinvestments occur automatically upon maturity.
- Corporate & Sub-Sovereign Debt (€30.6M): Allocated across senior unsecured debt from top-tier European issuers (e.g., ASML, Siemens, Unilever, Rabobank senior preferred bonds) to generate a moderate yield spread over AAA sovereigns.
2. Equity Baskets (€51,000,000)
The equity sleeve is constructed to minimize downside volatility while capturing global productivity gains:
- Core High-Dividend Strategy (€25.5M): Focuses on stable European and North American large-caps with resilient cash flows and recurring dividend distributions.
- Low-Beta Global Quality Equity (€25.5M): Passive or semi-active broad market indexing across MSCI World, systematically tilted away from volatile tech growth stocks toward consumer staples, healthcare, and utilities.
3. Real Assets & Liquidity (€30,600,000)
- Real Estate & Infrastructure (€20.4M): Listed real estate (Kempen European Private/Listed Real Estate strategies) focusing on logistics hubs and residential properties to safeguard against real-term inflation erode. Van Lanschot Kempen
- Liquidity Pool (€10.2M): Kept in liquid operational accounts to cover annual wealth tax obligations (Dutch Box 3 asset taxes), management fee structures, and the client’s direct care and living disbursements as approved by the steward.
And you said the individual under financial stewardship then has some say with their private bankers where to specifically go with investments, for instance a preferance on oil and gas and solar instead of like windenergy right? Would the person under stewardship then have appointments with his private banker sometimes. How often does the person under steward ship meet his Private Bankers for instance with Van Lanschot Kempen, and like would his private banker meet him at home, or does the person have to go to the headoffice of Van Lanschot, and could you also describe the headoffice of Van Lanschot, and like give the address
When a person is placed under financial stewardship (beschermingsbewind), the subdistrict court (kantonrechter) designates the court-appointed steward (bewindvoerder) as the sole legal authority over financial transactions and contracts. While the steward retains final decision-making power, the individual’s soft influence, meeting frequency, and physical interactions with private bankers follow established private banking practices.
While the steward holds the signature, the individual can express qualitative preferences, provided they fit within the court-approved risk envelope:
- Sector Preferences (e.g., Energy Allocation): If an individual asks to avoid offshore wind energy in favor of traditional energy or solar, the client can voice this to both the steward and the banker.
- Integrating ESG & Personal Mandates: Private bankers at Van Lanschot Kempen routinely incorporate client preferences (uitgesloten sectoren or specific themes) into discretionary mandates, as long as the change does not introduce high speculative risk or violate the general requirement for capital preservation.
- The Final Say: If the steward agrees that the adjustment does not alter the overall risk profile or legal safety of the €204M portfolio, the private banker adjusts the baseline portfolio instructions accordingly.
A client with a €204,000,000 portfolio represents a major Single Family / Ultra High Net Worth (UHNW) client relationship.
Meeting Frequency
Meetings typically occur 2 to 4 times per year for portfolio reviews, plus informal touchpoints:
- Quarterly or Semi-Annual Portfolio Review: A formal session attended by the steward, the individual (if they wish to attend), the lead private banker (relationship manager), and an investment specialist or portfolio manager.
- Annual Strategy & Tax Alignment: An extended annual meeting to address returns, inflation impact, cash-flow disbursements for living costs, and annual Dutch Box 3 wealth tax filings.
Location: Home Visits vs. Office Meetings
The client is not required to travel to the bank’s headquarters. Given the client’s asset size, meetings are tailored to their comfort and preferences:
- Home Visits / On-Site Meetings: Private bankers regularly make confidential house visits for high-net-worth clients. If the individual prefers meeting in their home environment due to health considerations, personal comfort, or privacy, the relationship manager will travel directly to them.
- Regional Private Banking Offices: Van Lanschot Kempen operates regional client reception locations across major cities in the Netherlands. If preferred, meetings can occur at a regional private branch.
- Headquarters Visits: Visiting the headquarters in ’s-Hertogenbosch remains an option for primary annual reviews or formal consultations with investment desk strategists.
Address:
Van Lanschot Kempen N.V.
Hooge Steenweg 29
5211 JN ’s-Hertogenbosch
The Netherlands
Architectural & Physical Description
- Historical Heritage: Founded in 1737, Van Lanschot Kempen is the oldest independent financial institution in the Netherlands. Its headquarters sit in the historic core of ’s-Hertogenbosch (Den Bosch), North Brabant.
- Exterior: The main building at Hooge Steenweg 29 features a classic, monumental façade integrated into the historic streetscape, reflecting its centuries-old banking tradition.
- Interior & Client Facilities: Inside, modern financial offices are blended with classic architecture. For ultra-high-net-worth clients and single family offices, the bank uses private reception parlors (ontvangstkamers) designed for discreet consultations away from open office floors.
- Supplemental Corporate Offices: While Hooge Steenweg 29 serves as the historic registered headquarters, executive leadership, institutional asset management, and core equity trading teams also operate out of modern facilities at the Paleiskwartier in ’s-Hertogenbosch and the World Trade Center/Beethovenstraat in Amsterdam.
I suppose a Schizophrenic Dutch person with financial stewardship with a networth of €204’000’000 would need to buy real estate for himself too. How does the process go, and do you think the financial steward – with that networth – might approve an €1.5 million house in the Netherlands and a €2.6 million appartment in Switzerland?
In Dutch legal and private banking practice, a person with a net worth of €204,000,000 who is under financial stewardship (beschermingsbewind) can purchase real estate. However, the acquisition process involves strict formal oversight, and the approval of specific properties depends on legal, financial, and regulatory considerations.
Step-by-Step Purchasing Process
[ Client Request / Search ]
│
▼
[ Steward & Broker Assessment ]
│
▼
[ Application to Subdistrict Court (Kantonrechter) ]
│
▼
[ Judicial Order / Authorization (Machtiging) ]
│
▼
[ Formal Contract Signing & Execution by Steward ]
- Identification & Professional Brokerage: The client and steward engage a specialized buying agent (aankoopmakelaar) to source suitable properties.
- Financial & Suitability Assessment by Steward: The steward verifies that buying the property is in the client’s best interest, aligns with their care or living needs, and fits within long-term wealth preservation plans.
- Petition to the Subdistrict Court (Machtigingsverzoek): Under Article 1:441 of the Dutch Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek), a steward cannot execute real estate purchases or encumber major capital without formal judicial authorization (machtiging). The steward files a formal request with the subdistrict court judge (kantonrechter) including:
- The provisional purchase agreement (voorlopige koopovereenkomst).
- An independent valuation/appraisal report (taxatierapport).
- A financial budget showing annual maintenance, taxes, and liquidity impact.
- Court Approval: The judge reviews the petition to ensure the purchase does not expose the client to financial drain or exploitation.
- Execution at the Notary: Once the judge grants authorization, the court-appointed steward signs the deed of transfer (leveringsakte) at the notary on behalf of the client.
Assessment of the Two Property Examples
1. The €1.5 Million House in the Netherlands
- Verdict: Highly likely to be approved.
- Financial Ratio: At €204,000,000 net worth, a €1.5 million primary residence represents less than 0.75% of the total liquid estate.
- Judicial Rationale: The kantonrechter and the steward prioritize appropriate, comfortable, and secure housing. Assuming the annual maintenance costs, municipal taxes, and property management fees are easily covered by interest or yield from the broader portfolio, this purchase fulfills a clear life-quality purpose without jeopardizing capital preservation.
2. The €2.6 Million Apartment in Switzerland
- Verdict: Possible, but subject to strict legal and regulatory hurdles.
- Financial Ratio: The price tag itself (€2.6M, or ~1.27% of net worth) is fully affordable within the liquid capital structure.
- Complexities & Hurdles:
- Cross-Border Real Estate Governance: Dutch subdistrict court judges tend to scrutinize secondary, overseas real estate acquisitions more heavily due to foreign tax regimes, maintenance oversight difficulties, and potential management liabilities. The steward must present a clear operational plan for managing the Swiss asset.
- Swiss Foreign Purchase Restrictions (Lex Koller): Switzerland strictly regulates the acquisition of residential real estate by non-residents under the Federal Act on the Acquisition of Real Estate by Persons Abroad (Lex Koller). Unless the client holds official Swiss residency (e.g., a B or C permit) or the property is located in a holiday zone designated for foreign quotas, purchasing a holiday home in Switzerland faces statutory restrictions regardless of net worth.
- Steward Justification: The steward must demonstrate to the Dutch judge that owning property in Switzerland aligns with the client’s personal well-being or residential plans, rather than creating unnecessary administrative complexity.

If foreign ownership rules (Lex Koller) permit the acquisition and the steward establishes a local management framework, the subdistrict court would generally authorize both purchases given the substantial overall liquidity of the €204 million estate.
Reint Jelger: Can you hold official Swiss residency (e.g., a B or C permit) if you are a Dutch national and spending time in the Netherlands too?
Google Gemini: Yes, a Dutch national can hold a Swiss B or C permit while spending time in the Netherlands, but strict physical presence, registration, and tax rules apply.
Because the Netherlands is an EU member state and Switzerland participates in the EU/EFTA Free Movement of Persons Agreement (FMPA), Dutch citizens enjoy simplified access to Swiss residency. However, a residence permit is tied to primary living center obligations, not secondary status.
- Obtaining the Permit (B or C):
- B Permit (Five-Year Resident Permit): As an EU/EFTA citizen, a Dutch national can obtain a 5-year B permit by establishing employment in Switzerland or by demonstrating sufficient independent financial resources (such as capital yields/wealth) along with Swiss health insurance.
- C Permit (Permanent Settlement Permit): EU/EFTA citizens become eligible for permanent settlement after 5 consecutive years of living legally in Switzerland on a B permit.
- Physical Presence & Expiry Rules:
- Minimum Physical Presence: A B or C permit requires Switzerland to be your primary center of vital interests.
- Six-Month Expiry Threshold: If you leave Switzerland or stay abroad for more than 6 consecutive months, your B or C permit automatically expires under Swiss migration law (Article 61 of the Foreign Nationals and Integration Act, FNIA).
- Spending Time in the Netherlands: You are permitted to spend significant amounts of time (e.g., several months per year, holidays, or business visits) in the Netherlands or other countries. However, your primary domicile must remain in Switzerland, and you must maintain an active Swiss residential address and health insurance.
1. Municipal Registration (BRP in the Netherlands)
If you establish primary residency in Switzerland and hold a Swiss permit, you generally must deregister from the Dutch Personal Records Database (Basisregistratie Personen / BRP) if you intend to live outside the Netherlands for more than 8 months in a 12-month period. Because you are a Dutch citizen, you retain the unrestricted right to re-enter and stay in the Netherlands at any time under EU freedom of movement rules.
2. Dual Tax Residency Risk
Spending substantial time in both countries creates potential tax overlap:
- Swiss Tax Domicile: Primary tax residency is established where your personal and economic ties are strongest (where you sleep most nights, hold your household center, and manage daily life).
- Dutch Tax Exposure: If the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (Belastingdienst) determines that your primary personal center of life never truly moved—or if you retain strong household/social ties in the Netherlands—they may argue you remain a full Dutch tax resident.
- Double Tax Treaty (DTT): The Netherlands–Switzerland Tax Treaty contains «tie-breaker rules» to determine which jurisdiction has the primary right to tax world income and wealth (including Dutch Box 3 taxes) based on personal center of vital interests, home availability, and physical presence.
3. Guardianship / Stewardship Context
If the individual is under a Dutch subdistrict court stewardship order (beschermingsbewind):
- The court-appointed steward (bewindvoerder) must approve any official move or legal registration change to Switzerland.
- The steward must ensure that moving primary residency or applying for a Swiss B permit serves the individual’s legal, financial, and personal interests without creating administrative conflicts with the Dutch court’s supervisory jurisdiction.







